Confirm your Grant Surge — Major
This is the big one. Let's make sure the panel fights for it.
Grant Surge — Major
- Structural rebuild of the Specific Aims page and case for support
- “Skeptical Panelist” simulation — the critique before the panel writes it
- Aims-to-budget coherence check — the ask must match the science
- Two revision passes after you implement
- 45-minute live strategy session with your specialist
- Turnaround: seven business days from confirmation
Tenure-Track Accelerator client? Director and Partner tiers already include grant cycles — check before you buy twice. Compare the tiers
Quick answers
Three quick answers
Do you write the proposal for me?
No. We restructure the argument, run the panel critique and tell you where a reviewer will push back. Your science, your data, your authorship. A request that crosses into ghostwriting gets a written no and the reason.
This is a resubmission. Does that change anything?
It changes almost everything, and for the better: the prior summary statements tell us exactly what the panel already objected to. Upload them at intake and the response-to-critique strategy is built from them rather than from guesswork.
Can my research office pay centrally?
Yes — an institutional invoice or PO is our most common route at this tier. Choose it at checkout, or contact us with your finance contact and we issue the paperwork within one business day.
Smaller mechanism? Compare with Seed
Department or research office paying? Choose Institutional invoice / PO at checkout and we issue a PO-ready scope document within one business day — Request an invoice.
Global South Scholar Fund — a 30% subsidy for eligible applicants.
No ghostwriting, ever. We restructure and stress-test your argument; we never write the proposal that goes out under your name.