Confirm your Grant Surge — Seed
For internal, pilot and small foundation grants — where a tight, fundable Specific Aims page decides everything.
Grant Surge — Seed
- Structural rebuild of the Specific Aims page
- Reviewer-risk annotation: where a panellist will push back, and your answer
- Aims-to-budget coherence check — the ask must match the science
- One revision pass after you implement
- Turnaround: five business days from confirmation
Quick answers
Three quick answers
Do you write the Aims page for me?
No. We restructure and sharpen what you have, and annotate where a panellist will push back. Your ideas, your data, your authorship. If a request crosses into ghostwriting we say no and explain why in writing — that refusal is the product.
Is Seed enough for my scheme?
Seed is built for internal, pilot and small foundation mechanisms, where the Aims page carries the decision. If you are applying to NIH, NSF, ERC or a consortium call, choose Major — it adds the panel-critique simulation and a second revision pass. If you are unsure, send the call text before you buy and we will tell you which one fits.
What happens if you take my money and it turns out not to fit?
That is what the Fit Guarantee is for. We read the call text and your draft before work starts, and if a Grant Surge is not what your proposal needs, we say so before charging you — not after.
Compare with Major — for NIH, NSF, ERC and consortium calls.
Global South Scholar Fund — a 30% subsidy for eligible applicants. Ask before you pay; that route is an eligibility check, not a checkout.
No ghostwriting, ever. We restructure and stress-test your argument; we never write the proposal that goes out under your name.